requestId:68499ab3cd2365.62541626.
Wang Yangming and Nietzsche’s good and evil views
Author: Jay Jun
SourceSweetheart Garden: Author Author Authorized Confucian Website Published in “Zhejiang Social Sciences” No. 11, 2017
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou and the early October 20th day of Wuwu
Jesus November 27, 2017
Content summary:The most successful Chinese traditional good and evil views is Yang Ming, and the top of the Eastern good and evil speech is Nietzsche. According to Yangming’s confidant universe, we can learn two kinds of good deeds. Nietzsche’s good and evil view is now concentrated in his teaching of power and will, and the superhuman virtues produced by this are the top of Eastern moral view. By comparing Yang Ming’s good and evil views with Nietzsche’s superhuman virtues, you can see the symptom of Chinese and Western morals and the unique characteristics and supernatural nature of the knowledge of confidants.
Keywords: Wang YangBaoqing.comMing Nietzsche Good and evil viewing
Media
The Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism is another Cen Ling in the development of Confucianism, and Yang Ming Min is the master of the Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism. Nietzsche is the peak of the development of modern philosophy in the East. Comparing the good views of these two will bring about the synonyms of Chinese and Eastern, traditional and modern thinking. It can also be explained from this the value and meaning of Chinese traditional thinking in modern times.
1 Yangming’s good and evil views
Yangming’s good and evil views have more research articles, and most of the articles are guides on moral subjectivity, moral metaphysics, and life theory. Some scholars talked about the basis of the universe theory of the yang Ming and evil, but in the end they regarded this universe theory as a mental study of the universe rather than a celestial principle of the universe[1]. This article is about illuminating the good and evil view of the illumination based on the theory of the universe.
(I) Yang Ming’s confidant universe view.
To Yangming, the existence of the entire universe is the existence of a confidant of the heavenly principles (the human mind and confidant also include it). After it uses style and transformation into thousands of things, it is a world of intention or atmosphere. All real existences, whether invisible or invisible, are all behaviors of intention and atmosphere [2]. As the root of the universe, the heavenly confidant is aura after it has been developed [3], and the confidant in the mind is originally combined with the confidant in heaven before it has developed. Just like the confidant in heaven, it is the meaning of the human heart. And the meaning of people and their hearts is the focus of this universe [4].
In this way, in contrast to the heavenly confidant and the human heart, “meaning” is divided into two levels: one is the meaning of the whole body of all things, that is, the innate intention or atmosphere; the other is the meaning of the human heart as the charm of tens of things and the spiritual mind, that is, the meaning of the response. And this “meaning” that is wise and sensitive includes content such as “intellect”, “emotion”, “intellectual” [5].
Confidant and mind are the same relationship between physical usage [6]. Based on this kind of physical application, the universe of Yangming’s confidant can be shown as follows:
The confidant of heaven and the confidant of human heart are originally one. After use, it is a world of intention or atmosphere. In the developed world, the head (body) is a human being, and the use of it is a thing. There are also differences in the use of the body in the human body, the body is the mind and the body is the body. In the use of human heart, the whole body is the meaning, and the main body of the mind is knowledge, and its functions are emotions and thoughts.
It can be seen that this universe not only has formed the purpose of unity of all things and the use of the sun, but also meets the purpose of unity of mind and matter and the unity of knowledge and action. In this universe, the existence of spiritual wisdom is its focus and spirit. For example, the laws of nature, people, mind, knowledge, etc. are all the existences of the head, and all things, bodies, emotions, and consciousness are all the existences of nature. Although there are differences between brain and stalk, it is ultimately a whole. In this way, it is not difficult for us to understand the purpose of unity in the series of sunlight. Yangming’s goodness is generated precisely on this integrated whole foundation.
(II) Yang Ming’s good deeds.
Because the universe is a whole, its goodness is also mentioned from the whole. Yangming’s good and evil views are most obvious in his four sentences. The first sentence “The body of no good and no evil” means that in the universe of close friends, all things are in their original or natural states [7], either without good or bad, or the most good. This concept of “best good” can also be expressed by the common meaning of “good”. So what is evil? Abuse is just an over and insufficient state of the essence of goodness (or goodness). Abuse is not an independent existence, but a distorted physical manifestation of goodness. In this sense, Yang Ming said that good deeds are one thing [8].
Then, no goodHow can a universe of evil or supreme good (including humans) be too much and too little? The second sentence “There are good and malicious movements” clearly states this. When the universe is not buried in its undeveloped state, it is not burdened by its invisible quality, so it is spiritual and natural, and it is flowing smoothly, which is the ultimate good. And when it has been developed, it becomes an intangible existence (including energy, consciousness, etc.), when all things and people are bound by the form and produce rigid forms and concepts, it is bad to be too far. Our already born universe is a world of morphological “meaning” or “gas”, and over and underestimate are constant. It is 彩票 that this shaped “meaning” or “gas” world is destined to be good and evil, so-called “good and evil movement” or “good and evil movement” [9].
In this way, we see several characteristics of Yangming’s good and evil: (1) The good and evil mentioned by Yangming are essentially different from the theory of morality and morality. The good deeds mentioned by Yangming are an inherently natural state of all things (also including people). In this natural state, all aspects of all existence include both natural and human; both the sensual aspects of people, as well as the sensibility aspects of emotions, desires, and will. This is a kind of judging justice from the whole. And ordinary evil is generated based on the nature and human social divisions. In people, they divide sensibility and nature (feelings, desires, will, etc.), and regard one door as good and other doors as bad. The good intentions that arise like this are actually a host and guest binary unity to establish good intentions. It does not develop from the natural state of all things, but defines good deeds from the love of the Lord. This kind of good and evil virtues generated by the opposing object has a kind of intent. Yang Ming’s good and evil virtues go beyond the opposing body, which directly points to the root of good and evil. (II) The evil and evil of Yangming are both good and evil. There is good and evil. No good and evil is the natural and natural state of the highest good, or it can also be said to be the state of only good and innocent. But the mismatch (over and underestimate) of this natural state in the process of style becomes evil, and evil is born from goodness. Therefore, there is evil, but evil is not the opposite of good. Don’t say that good and evil are one thing.
It can be seen that Yangming’s good and evil views go beyond the ordinary binary opposition of good and evil views. It can assess good and evil from the whole, so it can directly penetrate the ultimate root of good and evil.
According to the yang’s goodness standards, we can divide two types of goodness: one is the goodness in the natural state of all things (including humans) and the evil (over and insufficient) that is caused by being bound by form; the other is the natural goodness in people’s knowledge, emotion and intention, and the evil (over and insufficient) that is caused by stale abstraction and the influence of thoughts on knowledge, emotion and intention. Among these two categories, the former is in material meaning.The latter is energy-minded. But the overall good and evil standards are the same, because for Yangming, energy and material are both the products of confidants, and the difference between energy and material is only the level of spirituality.
The first type of goodness is better to understand. The natural state of nature and character is
發佈留言